Big mobile devices are big.

You know all those snarky bloggers in the US that wouldn’t be caught dead holding up a iPad to take a picture or pulling out a Galaxy Note to make a phone call? No such inhibitions here – I’ve seen people walking down crowded, pothole ridden sidewalks holding up an iPad in front of themselves, reading while they walk. Over the national holiday earlier this month, I saw numerous Chinese tourists whipping out their iPads to take the same family-standing-rigid-shot they’ve been taking for fifty years with other cameras. The Galaxy Note seems to be the phone of choice for the man-purse-Audi-driving set (i.e. it’s a real man’s phone). Yes, there are plenty of “normal” sized iPhone/Androids everywhere, but going big in public is certainly nothing to be ashamed of here.

Parking on the sidewalk.

Chalk this up to “most unexpected annoying thing so far” on my list: everyone (in Beijing at least) parks on the damn sidewalk. Yes, there are a lot of cars and not enough sidewalks, but there is really no excuse for how widespread of a problem this is. I asked a friend how long this has been going on, and he said it’s really only exploded as a issue in the last year or so, but it is so bad that often there is no way to even walk on the (rather wide) sidewalks at all, and the only – quite ironic actually – way you can continue moving forward is to go around the cars by walking in the street. My friend told me that people do get fined for parking this way (about 200 RMB or around $30), but honestly, if you can afford a car in China, a 200 RMB fine once-in-awhile is really nothing. Why the Beijing government has not figured out that it can make a ton of money by towing all of these cars is beyond me, but maybe they are just worried that it will increase the trend of…

Few people smile anymore.

It took a couple of weeks for this to sink in, but it really is true (again, I’m mainly talking about Beijing here because I haven’t traveled much to this point) – people are smiling a heck of a lot less these days. My feeling is that it is a mixture of a lot of crappy things (terrible rains/floods this summer, historically weird political situation, all those cars parked on sidewalks, the TERRIBLE air quality, et al), but I think the main reason is pretty simple…

Everything costs way more than it used to.

I’d been told about the inflation, but I have to be honest, before I got here I was still very much like, “yeah, ok, it’s more, but it’s still China – you can always find inexpensive stuff if you shop in the right places”… well, I was most wrong. Nearly everything is way more expensive (and this goes outside of the capital as well – I was out in the countryside this weekend and was told construction workers for hire are 4x a day what they were six years ago), including of course real estate. Which brings me to my last observation for now…

Things are slowing down.

Now, I don’t mean to say this in an economic way necessarily (where they’re getting the money I don’t know ((all those extra houses they bought maybe?)), but people are still spending left and right), but I get the sense that the big spinning wheel that was China the last 15 years or so is starting to do less revolutions per second. Again, I don’t believe it signals a shift in economics – things are generally pretty slow going in the US, but the slow turning wheel that is America still in general does a good job of figuring out how to make money – but rather just either a natural winding down or perhaps even a realization that maybe society can’t deal with a breakneck pace of life forever. Are people tired? I suspect yes, they are. The last couple of years have been very trying on Chinese society (really starting with the outrage over the Sichuan earthquake, and piled on by multiple events since), and after six short weeks, I feel like people here are feeling the weight of the world on their shoulders (and of course much much much much more so for the many impoverished). I’m not sure what it would take to lift this weight from people’s shoulders (and I’m guessing if you ask most people here if they think their life will be better in 5-10 years they will probably overwhelmingly say “yes”), but the weight is there, and – like the air – they are sour and gloomy. 

Less than a week after its developer conference, Google has announced* that it is shutting down a few services, most notably its startpage, iGoogle.

I have no idea how many people still use startpages (big with Yahoo! users perhaps?), but I imagine it’s not too much of a stretch to think that the number has been steadily declining from what was probably never a huge number of serious users in the first place.

Of course, the startpage is almost synonymous with the “widget” era (which in many ways is still going strong, just not the way people imagined in the middle of the last decade), so as widgets “died” so to did any real need for the startpage – right?

Well, I’m not so sure. Though startpages never really caught fire, the idea still holds a lot of appeal I believe. Take Windows 8 & Windows Phone 7/8 for example – they’re basically a better looking version of the old startpage. Homescreen widgets (there’s that word again) in Android also form a kind of startpage as well, though they are not as prominent as in Windows 8. iOS, however, hasn’t really followed the startpage pedigree – a fact that I think has hurt it, frankly.

Beyond these operating systems, the idea of a dashboard has certainly stuck with us hard, as the continued popularity of Tweetdeck (the old version of course) and Hootsuite has shown. Beyond Tweetdeck, there are a ton of other dashboards like Geckoboard and Ducksboard that have serious potential (though unlike startpages, you have to pay to use them).

So it is somewhat surprising to me that instead of shuttering iGoogle, that Google didn’t instead transform it onto another platform – and the obvious choice for that would have been Google+. In fact, Google set itself up nicely to do just that: all that darn white space on the right hand side of Google+ was just begging for an iGoogle-like filling of widgets.

iGoogle might be headed to the deadpool, but the dream of the startpage is still alive.

Image

More on TechCrunch & The Next Web among many other sites

The keynote for this year’s Google i/o developer conference just ended, with the major announcements being Android 4.1 (Jelly Bean), the Nexus 7 tablet, the Nexus Q home media device, and a skydiving first demo of Google’s up until now, mostly-hushed Project Glass.

There was a fair amount of interesting – if not completely surprising – news (biggest surprise was probably offline voice typing, which seems like a great feature) during the keynote, but I was still left with a few pressing questions that I felt were not addressed.

1. Where is the full read/write API for Google+?

How can Google possibly advance the adoption of Google+ (which it says has 150M monthly users) if it still doesn’t have a full read/write API after being in existence for a whole year? Many people – myself included – had assumed that Google would roll out a ton of APIs for Google+ soon after it launched, but one year in – and at the logical stage for finally announcing it – Google still hasn’t given developers the tools to build Google+ into their apps. Tomorrow is the actual first year anniversary, so perhaps Google will make the API available then?

2. Is it going to be possible to share augmented reality experiences between Project Glass users?

While the skydiving demo of Project Glass was certainly audacious, I was personally underwhelmed by the tech on display (which could have been accomplished with helmet-mounted webcam frankly). I was hoping to see some augmented reality superimposed over the images we were seeing from the glasses, but that either isn’t part of the tech at this point or is not something that can be broadcast beyond the glasses. Either way, the demo didn’t even come close to realizing the mockup video that Google released earlier this year for Project Glass (and yes, I know it was a futuristic vision, but there wasn’t any augmented reality on display today).

3. Why doesn’t the Nexus 7 tablet have two cameras?

I’m not the first to bring this up, but I just have to ask again what Google’s motivation is with this one? Price? Usage? Just seems like something a major misstep to me.

4. Does the Nexus Q let you mirror your device’s display?

The Nexus Q more or less acts like a Apple’s AirPlay with one seemingly glaring exception – I haven’t seen anyone say that you can mirror your device through the Nexus Q onto another screen. Perhaps they just didn’t cover it or that is just a developer app away, but that would seem like a no-brainer to me.

Ok, so those were my immediate questions following the keynote – hopefully some attendees at Google i/o will bring up these questions with the Google folk.

I previously/still have the original iPad (I first had the 16GB WiFi version for a year, then basically traded it for a 16GB 3G version which I’ve had for the last year) and skipped the iPad 2.

Though I was sorely tempted to get the iPad 2 a year ago, due to scarcity the first few weeks I didn’t – and after that period I came to realize I really didn’t need it – the iPad 1 was nearly as good, and in fact was nearly identical in one respect (and to me the most important one), the screen.

Yes, I know that the iPad 2′s screen was more vibrant than the original iPad, but still, resolution is where it’s at, and as everyone knows, that had stayed the same. I decided then and there that I would wait for the Retina iPad, even though many were saying that such a thing wasn’t even possible at the time (and maybe it wasn’t, I’m no display expert).

So I decided to wait, even if it meant that – like the iPhone – it took four generations to get to a Retina screen on the iPad. Luckily for me and a few million of my closest friends, Apple beat its cycle by a generation and delivered the iPad. So now for the review.

Forget LTE, the A5X, the improved camera (which I actually quite like), and forget that you’ll be forking over another $500+ that you could use for groceries or 2.5 Kindle Fires, the iPad is the screen and the screen is the iPad. Nothing else matters. I really don’t think it helps to mince words – nothing else matters.

Now, I say this as hardly an Apple fanboy. The only other Apple product I’ve ever owned was a 3rd gen iPod Touch, which I returned after a few months. No iPod. No Mac. No iPhone. I own a (soon to be sold on eBay) Android tablet, an Android phone, and a Windows 7 desktop. I’m not wearing iBlinders – the screen (i.e. the iPad) is just that good.

How good? Well, a few reviewers have likened it to the difference between standard and HDTV. It’s a good comparison (even if you could find one in a dumpster, would you really go get a non-HDTV and put it in your house at this point?) but I don’t think it’s the right comparison, because video on the iPad is just about the same as it is on the original iPad and on other tablets.

No, the better comparison is (and you have to be of at least a certain age to get this) between a dot-matrix printer and a laser printer, because when you see text on this thing, you simply can’t believe what you’re seeing. In fact, multiple times over the last week, I’ve printed out something from a laser printer, glanced at it, and wondered why it didn’t look as good as the text on my iPad. And I’m talking about top of the line office laser printers here. Honestly, text on the iPad is so good that I wouldn’t be surprised if someone at some point finds a correlation between lower printer sales and the popularity of the iPad.

Of course, since the iPad created and is defining an entire new tech segment, it would be like the original iPad was the first dot-matrix printer, was offered at a very reasonable price, and then two years later Apple came out with a laser printer for the same price. The first office laser printer was $17,000 (though interestingly, if you read the Wikipedia entries about dot-matrix and laser printers, the laser printer was actually invented a year before the dot-matrix printer, go figure).

But unless you are an investor, the business side of things isn’t what you care about – it’s the screen.

I really hope for your eyes’ sake that you’re reading this on an iPad.

In the 20th century, America’s greatest cultural export was Hollywood. Films and television produced in Southern California was America’s window to the world from before World War I until well after the Cold War had ended. If you’ve been abroad, you know that one constant that is almost impossible to escape (try as you may) is Hollywood. People around the world think all of America is basically like Los Angeles. It’s ingrained in how the world views the United States – but that, my friends is changing here in the 21st century. 

America’s greatest cultural icon now is tech – especially the Internet and some fruit company – and that cultural icon status has bred an environment of fame.

Fame is really what all of this tech journalism “discussion” stuff is really all about at its core. Tech producers (sound like a familiar title?) are becoming the new Tinseltown stars of the 21st century, and their companies are films that we all need to see. Fame, of course, is a derivative of people being intensely interested (obsessed) by the famous, and the middle women/men in this relationship are the press.

Now let’s be honest with ourselves here – where at one point tech stories were aimed at a corporate audience (think IT managers reading about Lotus Notes). The vast majority of interest in tech comes from consumers, and the continuing rapid release of new products/services that they use all the time in their everyday lives (and are fun - Lotus Notes was never fun) means that the public always wants more, and they want it now.

So you can call that a grab for pageviews if you want, but remember – the public eats this stuff up, and that brings me back to Hollywood.

Hollywood has the ‘Hollywood Press’, and for most of the 20th century they fed not only the American public what they wanted, but also the global public. Were they hard hitting at times? Yes. Did they rush to stories sometimes? I’m guessing yes. Did they throw up troll-worthy headlines? Absolutely. Did people eat it up around the world? Yes. In the end, did it do more good than bad? Well, that’s debatable, and I doubt many film stars would have a ton of great things to say about the press either then or now.

If the tech reporting industry takes a good hard look at itself right now, I think that it would see a lot of parallels to how it is evolving in the model that Hollywood did. I bet that would disgust many of them as well – but here’s the thing, we can learn from Hollywood’s mistakes.

The Hollywood press frankly made a mess of things over many years, and honestly, how much credibility do we give them now? In many cases they are either mouthpieces for the studios and stars or they simply “report” on things that have absolutely no substance whatsoever (and of course, the public still eats all that stuff up, it’s Hollywood after all).

Tech reporting, however, doesn’t have to go down that Path. We have the chance to report (and to some extent shape) one of the two most important stories of the 21st century (China being the other), and we can do that with a very critical eye while still feeding the masses as many constant updates as they can handle. Some will fall away from the journalist core and become tech’s ‘agents’, ‘directors’, and ‘executive producers’ – and some might even become the stars themselves. We don’t have to be the Hollywood Press 2.0, nor can we go back to the good-old-days (for some) of reporting for IT managers and tech business section of East Coast newspapers.

Nope, we can be the page of record for America’s (and ultimately the world’s) most important cultural contribution of the 21st century, and just leave it at that.

Some of you probably know that in addition to blogging a lot about insurance in my day job, I’ve also been doing short but extremely timely (i.e. I beat nearly everyone to the story) posts about tech over at TipDesk (which by the way, will be getting a new coat of black paint this coming weekend). TipDesk has been a great little adventure in short-form blogging, and I’ve certainly gained some good traction with it over the last ten months or so.

However, TipDesk is not really a place where I want to write long and thought out posts, and beyond that, the focus at TipDesk is all about tech news and updates, and my interests go far beyond that. So with this site, I’ll be writing more long-form stuff about big picture technology trends, about China and about crisis response. I’ll also throw in some random topics now and then, like rock climbing, chess, travel and maybe even fatherhood. Beyond that, I plan to use this site to publish some of short stories (I plan to put them all together into an Kindle book sometime soon) and to showcase some of my (very) amateur photography.

So yeah, basically this is going to be an old school “journal” of sorts, not some super topic-focused site (as I said, I’m already writing two of those kind of blogs already). I’m going to focus on writing well and from the heart, and hopefully some of you will get to know me a bit better in the process. Thanks for reading!

Image

One of the more interesting parts of the discussion was the question of whether Mainland Chinese MBA students (of which there were a good many in the room) would – and should – go back to China once they get their US degrees to be Internet entrepreneurs.

Eddie Chen – a class of ’04 Anderson graduate – did just that – kind of. He originally went back to China as an employee of AIG (he repeatedly said “it was fine when I was there!”) and then after awhile he said he couldn’t resist the temptation of the Internet any longer and started ICE with a few other partners.

When I said that running an Internet company in China is becoming increasingly difficult with all the self-policing going on, and that there are other, lower-profile, but highly profitable tech sectors to get into in China in addition to the Internet, Eddie said (paraphrasing), “well, I don’t have the skills to run a biotech company or anything, and the Internet is something I could do.” Of course, this is true for many Internet entrepreneurs around the world, not just in China. But Eddie started his company a few years ago, and as a gaming company, and I assume that it hasn’t been that difficult to stay out of the last six plus months of increasingly pain-in-the-ass self-censorship going on for more communications-focused web services. So the question I’ve been asking myself is: if I’m from Mainland China and just got my MBA from Anderson, would I jump on a plane at LAX right back to China to run an Internet startup?

Before I answer that, I think I’ll paraphrase what Bobby Chao said about how they invest in Internet startups in China (I’m paraphrasing so much because I was on the panel and didn’t have time to take notes). Bobby said, “We don’t care about censorship or any of that stuff. We focus on whether it is something completely new and on the commitment of the founders.” I regret not asking Bobby whether or not the last year or so has changed the first part of this investment strategy, but from his attitude, I doubt it. Regardless of the short-term impact, I suspect that as a long-term strategy this is completely correct (and hard to argue with a guy that put $13 million into Baidu that turned into $2 billion on the day search engine had its IPO).

We also had a bit of a discussion about whether Internet innovation was happening in China vis-a-vis Silicon Valley, and I have to agree with Eddie when he said, “there is business-model innovation” going on in China but that Silicon Valley still far outstrips anywhere in China in technological innovation. This of course led to a discussion about whether/how foreign Internet companies should enter and compete in China. Christine Lu, who is organizing rethink Shanghai in May, said from the audience, “you can’t out Chinese the Chinese” and this was generally agreed upon, especially when a multinational tries to just impose their will onto the China market, which almost never works. However, as I said on the panel, I think that there are plenty of Internet back-end technologies that can have success in China – it’s the web services and sites that can be easily cloned that have little chance of being successful in China.

So would I go back and set up shop in Zhongguancun or wherever and start throwing up a website? Well, yes and no. I’d go back, but personally I wouldn’t put up a website-based service, I’d focus on Android and possibly iPhone development (though Android probably has the better chance right now). Looking out into the crowd and watching the hands go up when we asked whether they’d go back, and regardless of the present challenges of running an Internet company in China, just as it is everywhere else (and quite possibly even more so) the Internet in China is still a huge opportunity for any entrepreneur, especially one that is a native speaker with a UCLA MBA. So to all those students there on Friday, thank you for listening for 90 minutes, and good luck not matter which side of the Pacific you end up on!

Image

Google today announced that they will take off the filters from Google.cn in a “what the hell? we might as well go out swinging with head held high” blog post. Whether you think it’s brilliant, courageous and/or desperate (I think it’s some of all, with the caveat that I also want a completely free and uncensored web for everyone, everywhere), it certainly marks another milestone in this ongoing clash between one of the world’s tech darlings and China.

Today’s announcement comes a few months after Google’s China chief Kai Fu Lee left the company (I’m venturing a guess that he knew all of this was coming and asked to not be put in the middle of it, and as he obviously wants a future in China, who can blame him). Since then, Google China has been without a clear captain, and rumors recently surfaced that employees had started looking for jobs elsewhere (and today’s announcement would seem to substantiate at least the idea that Google China employees have been prepared for the end). So personnel-wise, things have been in the works for a while now.

Google spent most of their announcement talking about hackers trying to get at human rights activist’s Gmail accounts and emails. There really isn’t anything I want to say about that other than hackers attack companies constantly and sometimes there are breaches and sometimes the hackers are (big surprise) working for foreign governments.

If Google decides to pick up and leave China (and although not out of the realm of possibility of them returning, doing so within say 3 years is probably next to impossible), the reason that they would leave is that they simply are putting too much into their efforts in the market, while denting their image worldwide (by censoring results) and are not getting back enough to justify it all. That’s the reason, plain and simple. And the real losers in this will be Chinese Internet users, who will lose a (not perfect) resource offered by a company that truly believes in the freedom and power of information. Don’t believe me? Google it… sorry, I mean Baidu it.

(Note: Upon re-reading and further reflection, I’ve edited this post since I first wrote it.)

From a personal standpoint, this was certainly China’s decade for me. I lived, got married and found a career in China this decade. I traveled to over 20 provinces, SARs and autonomous regions. I celebrated the new millennium with a few million other people in Shanghai, worked from home in Beijing during SARS, spent a week going to the Olympics, and even had a major role in a never-made-it-to-TV-because-the-plot-was-too-controversial-prime-time-soap-opera. Above all though, this was China’s decade for me because of the amazing friends that I made – all of which were helping to make China even more spectacular for me and others.

But that’s me. Other people (Chinese and expats) that have spent most or all of the last decade in China may or may not have the same feelings, or not. But I know that’s not what everyone wants to know – people want to know on a worldwide scale if this was China’s decade.

So how do we go about deciding this? I think that first of all, the real question should be when we say “China” what are we talking about? Its influence on world affairs? Its government? Its people? Its economy? Its environment? Its military? Its culture? I think we can pretty much rule out that China’s environment got better over the last 10 years (and that China is certainly not alone in this claim). As far as its military goes, they were not involved in any major conflicts, so I think that question is moot. So that leaves its influence on world affairs, government, people, economy and culture.

China certainly has become a more influential player in world politics over the last decade. From having the clout to get the Olympics in 2001 to the Six-Party Talks, to Africa’s best buddy, to a stabilizing voice in the economic crisis to the recent climate summit, China’s voice is increasingly heard above the din of most other nations. I wouldn’t say that its unprecedented, but certainly this was a major positive for a nation that spent so long on the world politics sidelines.

As far as China’s government goes over the last decade, what I will say is that they tried – tried to hold onto old ways while trying to cope and adjust to a new world order and population that they had nourished to change (and of course that pesky Internet didn’t help). Progress here has not been as swift as other parts of “China”, but there has been progress.

China’s people and culture. Wow, how do I even begin to access that? People have more money and property, more freedom, more access to information and more opportunity. They mainly went out and got this themselves. Not everything or everyone in China is pure and honest – big surprise there. Make no mistake, however, the Chinese people are making their country into their image, and if the answer I come to below is “yes”, half of it will be because of the Chinese people’s drive to make it happen. Which brings us to the final consideration: the economy.

There has never been anything like China’s economy over the last decade. It fired on all cylinders, didn’t miss a beat, hit all the marks – whatever superlative you can come up with for consistent spectacular performance, that’ll probably fit when trying to explain China’s economy over the last ten years. It reached into nearly all parts of Chinese life (for good and bad) and, yes, the Chinese people are better off because of the economy than they were in 1999.

So this was China’s decade, right? Well, if we are talking about economies and a people as a whole striving towards something, then I would say China wins the gold medal, in a sense. I say in a sense because I think that this decade was just the tip of the iceberg of what China will become, somewhat along the lines of what the United States did at the turn of the last century. Of course, I’m not the first person to point this out. But I think that China’s world reach hasn’t made itself felt everywhere yet (other than “Made in China”), unlike what I would consider to be the true namesake of this decade – the Internet. More than even China, the now ubiquitous Internet has changed our world (including China) in ways that cannot be undone. After all, my grandmother is on Facebook.

Image by the awesome Kris Krug

#10 Letters from Iwo Jima

Clint Eastwood directed a war movie that is nearly entirely in Japanese that won a Golden Globe for Best Foreign Language Film. Let that soak in for a minute. Any director that could produce such a deeply felt and noble movie in their own language would be considered a great director – that Eastwood could wring such emotion out of his actors in a language he doesn’t even speak – it may be the best directing job of the decade.

#9 Memento

Better known now for Batman Begins & The Dark Knight, director Nolan (based on a story by his brother) started out the decade with his best film, which boasts one of the best screenplays of all time. Guy Pierce is very good, but Nolan (who also wrote the screenplay) is why you watch this movie.

#8 Ratatouille

When I saw this Pixar film in the theater, I remember my jaw literally dropping at some of the artistry in which Paris is displayed. Brad Bird was brought in to save this movie from another director, and the result was the best animated film of the decade.

#7 Old Boy

I really don’t know how to explain this movie. How director Chan-wook Park packed as much as he did into two hours I don’t know, but what an intense two hours it is. You will never look at an octopus the same way again, that’s for sure.

#6 Zodiac

I doubt that this nearly three hour epic made many people’s best of the decade lists, and that is a shame. David Fincher’s methodical narrative does almost nothing wrong – every character seems real, every detail is explained, and every shot in the movie feels like Fincher spent days perfecting it.

#5 Touching the Void

I’m a rock climber and I read this book about 15 years ago, so when I heard that they were finally going to make a movie out of it (and thankfully that Tom Cruise would not be playing Joe Simpson) I wondered if there was any way that they could possibly translate the drama of the book onto screen without it feeling cheesy. Director Kevin Macdonald (who a few years later directed the very good Last King of Scotland which is in my 5-star-but-didn’t-make-the-cut-list below) figured it out, making it a documentary starring Joe Simpson plus an actor double. The results of Joe Simpson returning to the mountain that nearly killed him made this the best documentary of the decade.

#4 There Will be Blood

From the moment the film starts to the very last scene, it is impossible to not be riveted to the screen. There is something elemental about this film, something that goes beyond “the American experience” to a much darker place – if I were to compare this to any other movie, I would probably say Apocalypse Now. Daniel Day-Lewis seems almost possessed in this movie (he is famous for never breaking character while filming – not sure I would have wanted to be alone with him off set), turning kind of an extended version performance of his other great role of the decade from Gangs of New York.

#3 Twilight Samurai

There is so much soul in this movie that it is a bit hard to believe that it was made in these (let’s face it) shallow times. Twilight Samurai is barely about samurai – it is about family above all else and how life continually conspires to try to tear us from the people that matter the most to us.

#2 The Lord of the Rings Trilogy Extended Version

The nearly 12 hours that it takes to watch the extended version of Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings Trilogy is certainly not something that everyone will do all in one sitting. If, however, you are able to sit through it, you will simply marvel at how Jackson was able to bring so much scope, action, acting and special effects together for 12 hours of movie making (that is six 2 hour movies, more than most directors ever make) so seamlessly. No trilogy has ever been so complete, epic or entertaining.

#1 Children of Men

Few movies that I’ve seen have been able to instill in me the feeling that I was watching the a reasonable rendition of the future unfold on screen, but Alfonso Cuarón’s masterpiece Children of Men is one. Don’t get me wrong – I don’t want this future, and I honestly don’t think that our future will be so bleak. That said, the chaos that reigns in Cuarón’s England feels very real, and every character carries enough baggage to weigh down a tank (of which there are many in the film). Also, and this is without a doubt, Children of Men contains the best action sequence of any movie since perhaps Taxi Driver. In a decade when terror and the threat of terror caused wars and the fear of a new pandemic health event took hold, Children of Men – more than any other film of the decade – portrayed the mood and warned of the possible consequences if we don’t get out act together.

Best Director of the Decade

Clint Eastwood

Best Actor of the Decade

Tie: Daniel Day-Lewis & Leonardo DiCaprio

Best Actress of the Decade

Cate Blanchett

Great movies I saw this decade that didn’t make the cut

In no particular order: The Last King of Scotland, Mystic River, Wall-E, Black Hawk Down, Gladiator, Amelie (very hard to leave off), Bourne Identity, No Country for Old Men, The Assissination of Jesse James, Good Night and Good Luck, Frost/Nixon, An Inconvenient Truth, Sideways, City of God, Catch Me if You Can, Little Miss Sunshine, Spiderman 2, Superman, Babel, Gone Baby Gone, Million Dollar Baby, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Adaptation, Hero, Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon, Juno, Into the Wild, Persepolis…

…and I am sure many more that I’ll add as I think of them (and please feel free to suggest)

Probably Great Movies That I Haven’t Seen That Might Have Made My Top 40 (and yes, I know, I know, I need to watch them already)

4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days; King of Kong; Man on Wire; The Royal Tenenbaums; Before Sunset; The Lives of Others; Waltz with Bashir; Up; Let the Right One In; The Diving Bell and the Butterfly; Sexy Beast…again, suggestions welcome

The rest of the movies on my top 40 of the decade:

#11-20

#21-30

#31-40